Fast Cycle Production

Process Improvement Values that Always Work!

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home FCP Articles
FCP Articles

Understanding the X-Factor

E-mail Print PDF

Understanding the X-Factor: A Values Based Productivity Tool

In a perfect factory, there is no variation in the entry of product to the floor. Every minute of work is spent working on the product. There is no down time, no paperwork, no difficult versus easy product. As soon as the product is finished in one area, work begins at the next area. It is like product flowing on a conveyor belt. This perfect factory has perfect input and perfect output – one equals the other. The X Factor of this mythical factory is 1!

In a world-class factory, the time spent working on the product is only one third of the total cycle time. The product release is still constant, predictable and in line with the capabilities of the factory, but there is paperwork, delay and sometimes machine breakdown. Still, all of these variations are kept to a minimum. A world-class factory brings fear to those that are forced to compete with them. They know how to keep the variations in their process to a minimum. People that work there feel good about their job and their future. The X Factor of this very real factory is 3!

Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 05:38 Read more...
 

Managing in a Fast Cycle Production Facility

E-mail Print PDF

This article discusses the dynamics of management in a facility using Fast Cycle Production as a management philosophy of choice. The elements of this Values Based Management Philosophy are as follows:

1. TAKT Management - How to use TAKT and its power to establish and maintain a continuous improvement environment and mentality

2. WIP management - How to control WIP levels and keep them under control

3. Resource management - Establishing and maintaining a consistent, fair and predictable management style in a Fast Cycle Production environment.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 December 2008 07:44 Read more...
 

The Evolution of Simulation Modeling

E-mail Print PDF

As one who first started using simulation modeling in the early 90’s, it has been both exciting and educational to see how simulation modeling has evolved, especially within my own company. In those early days, simulation modeling was primarily used by "engineering types" for engineering purposes, such as determining the requirements capabilities of certain machines under various conditions.
 
As far as I know, I was one of the first to take simulation modeling out of the engineering department and put it into the hands of production people. I combined this "tool” with some production values that I subscribe to and used simulation to determine how a manufacturing plant or even a single department could improve their process productivity by analyzing potential changes to a process before they were implemented – and proving it!

In those days, simulation wasn’t trusted because there was a verification issue with simulation. Verification was described simply by saying, “To what degree can we be certain that the model is telling us the truth?”  The old saying, “garbage in, garbage out” was a very real problem when it came to credibility. The problem with verification in those days was pretty much a function of whether the simulator, rather than the simulation, was credible and could be trusted. The thought of making a very expensive change to a layout, or the purchase of expensive machines based on the output of a simulation was scary to many managers, and was a hard obstacle to deal with.

Last Updated on Monday, 26 January 2009 09:40 Read more...
 

A Case Study at IBM - Part 1

E-mail Print PDF
 



LEAN AND AGILE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS:

COMPETING OR COMPLEMENTARY APPROACHES TO WORLD CLASS MANUFACTURING?
Part 1
 
A CASE STUDY

 
CHAPTERS 1-3
 
Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 05:43 Read more...
 

The Effects of Fragmented Manufacturing Philosophies

E-mail Print PDF
Some of the companies that I have worked with in the past made significant gains during the productivity improvement project but failed to maintain their productivity levels a year or more after the project. In each and every case, the initial improvement was significant, and could have been even more significant, had certain forces not been in play.

Some of those companies achieved truly impressive gains in productivity in a short period of time. All that they had to do in order to be even more successful was to keep doing what they were doing. Instead, some of these companies experienced a serious case of recidivism and reverted back to their former selves over time for what seemed to be no logical reason.

How could this happen? One would think that, having achieved such success, that they would continue to improve on their productive capabilities in a continuous improvement effort and become best of breed among their competitors. Logic would dictate that if they remained productive, their profits and market share would greatly improve. All of their leading indicators tied to production would be better if they would just stay on the chosen path. Did they choose to lose their edge or was it something else that caused the erosion?

Last Updated on Sunday, 15 March 2009 10:18 Read more...
 


Page 2 of 3

Newsflash

Fast Cycle Production no longer sells ShowFlow Simulation Software.  However, FCP continues to be by far the leading consulting group for this platform in the United States.  We still take support questions as well as provide simulation solutions for organizations and consultants wishing to analyze their processes using this very inexpensive yet powerful application.  You can read more about ShowFlow here.